Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 5 de 5
1.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci ; 31: e74, 2022 Oct 17.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36245424

AIMS: Cancer patients often present with psychological symptoms that affect their quality of life, physical health outcomes and survival. Two of the most frequent psychiatric comorbidities are anxiety and depression. However, the prevalence of these disorders among cancer patients remains unclear, as studies frequently report varying rates. In the present study, we aimed to provide robust point estimates for the prevalence of anxiety and depression for both a mixed cancer sample and for 13 cancer types separately, considering confounding variables. METHODS: In a sample of 7509 cancer outpatients (51.4% female), we used the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to assess rates of anxiety and depression. Applying ordinal logistic regression models, we compared the prevalence of anxiety and depression between different cancer types, controlling for age and gender. RESULTS: About one third of our sample showed symptoms of anxiety (35.2%) or depression (27.9%), and every sixth patient had a very likely psychiatric condition, with women being more frequently affected. Elderly patients more often showed signs of depression. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was significantly higher in lung and brain cancer patients, than in other cancer patients. Lowest depression rates were found in breast cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of anxiety and depression is high in cancer patients. Type of cancer is an important predictor for anxiety and depressive symptoms, with lung and brain cancer patients being highly burdened. Considering a personalised medicine approach, physicians should take into account the high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities and include psychiatric consultations in the treatment plan.


Brain Neoplasms , Breast Neoplasms , Hematologic Neoplasms , Aged , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Quality of Life
2.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(5): 2405-2413, 2021 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32918609

OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to examine patients' experiences of end-of-life (EOL) discussions and to shed light on patients' perceptions of the transition from curative to palliative care. METHODS: This study was based on a qualitative methodology; we conducted semi-structured interviews with advanced cancer patients admitted to the palliative care unit (PCU) of the Medical University of Vienna. Interviews were recorded digitally and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed based on thematic analysis, using the MAXQDA software. RESULTS: Twelve interviews were conducted with patients living with terminal cancer who were no longer under curative treatment. The findings revealed three themes: (1) that the medical EOL conversation contributed to the transition process from curative to palliative care, (2) that patients' information preferences were ambivalent and modulated by defense mechanisms, and (3) that the realization and integration of medical EOL conversations into the individual's personal frame of reference is a process that needs effort and information from different sources coming together. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study offer insight into how patients experienced their transition from curative to palliative care and into how EOL discussions are only one element within the disease trajectory. Many patients struggle with their situations. Therefore, more emphasis should be put on repeated offers to have EOL conversations and on early integration of aspects of palliative care into the overall treatment.


Death , Interview, Psychological/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care/methods , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Communication , Female , Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/psychology , Oncologists , Perception , Qualitative Research
3.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28488812

Body mass index (BMI) is a prognostic factor in several cancer types. We investigated the prognostic role of BMI in a large patient cohort with newly diagnosed lung cancer brain metastases (BM) between 1990 and 2013. BMI at diagnosis of BM and graded prognostic assessment (GPA) were calculated. Definitions were underweight (BMI <18.50), weight within normal range (BMI 18.50-24.99) and overweight (BMI ≥ 25.00). A total of 624 patients (men 401/624 [64.3%]; women 223/624 [35.7%]; median age of 61 [range 33-88]) were analysed. Histology was non-small cell lung cancer in 417/622 (66.8%), small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in 205/624 (32.9%) and not otherwise specified in 2/624 (0.3%) patients. About 313/624 (50.2%) had normal BMI, 272/624 (43.5%) were overweight and 39/624 (6.3%) were underweight. Underweight patients had shorter median overall survival (3 months) compared to patients with normal BMI (7 months) and overweight (8 months; p < .001; log rank test). At multivariate analysis, higher GPA class (HR 1.430; 95% cumulative incidence, CI 1.279-1.598; p < .001; Cox regression model), SCLC histology (HR 1.310; 95% CI 1.101-1.558) and presence of underweight (HR 1.845; 95% CI 1.317-2.585; p = .014; Cox regression model) were independent prognostic factors. Underweight at diagnosis of BM in lung cancer is associated with an unfavourable prognosis.


Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Overweight/epidemiology , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/mortality , Thinness/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/secondary , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/secondary , Survival Rate
4.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 25(4): 544-50, 2016 Jul.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26564404

The comprehensive assessment of symptoms is the basis for effective, individualised palliative treatment. Established scoring systems provide in-depth information but are often lengthy and hence unsuitable. We introduce the PERS(2) ON score as a short and practically feasible score to evaluate symptom burden. Fifty patients admitted to a Palliative Care Unit rated seven items, i.e. pain, eating (loss of appetite/weight loss), rehabilitation (physical impairment), social situation (possibility for home care), suffering (anxiety/burden of disease/depression), O2 (dyspnoea) and nausea/emesis, on a scale ranging from 0 (absence) to 10 (worst imaginable), resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 70. Assessments were performed at admission, 7 days after admission and at the day of discharge. Symptom intensity scores were calculated, and change over time was evaluated. A significant improvement was observed from the PERS²ON score between admission and 7 days (P < 0.001; paired t-test). Significant improvement from baseline evaluation to evaluation on the day of discharge was observed (P = 0.001; paired t-test). This study provides initial evidence that the PERS²ON score is both feasible and sensitive to changes of the most prominent symptoms in palliative care. It may be useful in clinical practice to direct palliative treatment strategies and provide targeted symptom management.


Neoplasms/psychology , Palliative Care/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/psychology , Attitude to Health , Dyspnea/psychology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Home Care Services , Humans , Karnofsky Performance Status , Male , Middle Aged , Nausea/psychology , Pain/psychology , Patient Comfort , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vomiting/psychology
5.
Support Care Cancer ; 24(5): 1975-1982, 2016 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26476628

PURPOSE: Informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients are known to suffer from high distress due to their caregiving responsibilities. Nevertheless, a comprehensive evaluation of psychiatric morbidity is often missing in clinical practice due to time resources, and mental health problems may be unnoticed in this population. A feasible approach is needed to identify caregivers at risk for psychiatric disorders to offer targeted interventions and enhance their well-being. METHODS: This cross-sectional, multi-institutional study screened 345 caregivers of advanced cancer patients for psychiatric disorders (i.e., depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, and alcohol abuse/dependence) and assessed factors potentially associated with mental health diagnoses (including socio-demographic factors, burden, hope, caring-related quality of life, and coping preferences). RESULTS: Overall, almost 52 % of participants had one or more suspected psychiatric disorders, with anxiety being the most prevalent. Perceived hope, higher burden, and more emotion-oriented coping were associated with psychiatric morbidity in this sample. Spouses and parents showed significantly more symptoms of psychiatric disorders than other relatives. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the high risk of informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients to develop psychiatric disorders and suggests a practically feasible approach to identify at risk caregivers to offer support.


Caregivers/psychology , Cost of Illness , Mood Disorders , Neoplasms , Palliative Care/psychology , Quality of Life , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Stress, Psychological/prevention & control , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Aged , Australia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Mood Disorders/diagnosis , Mood Disorders/etiology , Mood Disorders/prevention & control , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Prevalence , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/etiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control
...